Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Correnti, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Reading Instruction With Teacher Logs

Brian Rowan and Richard Correnti


BRIAN ROWAN is the Burke A. Hinsdale Collegiate Professor in Education, research professor at the Institute for Social Research, and professor of sociology at the University of Michigan, 610 East University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; browan{at}umich.edu. His work focuses on education as an institution, paying special attention to the organization and management of instruction and its effects on student achievement.

RICHARD CORRENTI is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Education and a research scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 5801 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; rcorrent{at}pitt.edu. His research interests include the measurement and determinants of instruction, how professional development influences instruction, and how instruction affects student learning.

The authors argue that the criticisms of their earlier article on teacher logs (Educational Researcher, March 2009) by Smagorinsky and Willis (this issue of Educational Researcher) do not address, much less undermine, the evidence they presented as part of their validation argument about the teacher logs. Moreover, they argue that their method for studying classrooms is not nearly as incommensurate with Smagorinsky’s and Willis’s methods as those authors’ arguments seem to imply. The authors of this rejoinder see the main differences between themselves and their critics as being around the notion of "consequential" validity, an issue they discuss at the end of this article.

Key Words: instructional practices • measurements • research methodology

Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 7, 549-551 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09349313


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page