Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croninger, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Valli, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mixing It Up About Methods

Robert G. Croninger and Linda Valli


ROBERT G. CRONINGER is an associate professor in the Department of Education Policy Studies at the University of Maryland, 2110D Benjamin Building, College Park, MD, 20742–1175; croninge{at}umd.edu. His research focuses on research methods, the social context of schooling, teaching, teacher qualifications, and the distribution of educational opportunities.

LINDA VALLI is the Jeffrey and David Mullan Professor in Teacher Education–Professional Development in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Maryland, 2311 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD, 20742–1175; lrv{at}umd.edu. Her research focuses on professional development, teacher learning, teaching practices, school improvement, and cultural diversity.

The authors respond to the commentaries (this issue of Educational Researcher) on a series of articles (in the March 2009 issue of Educational Researcher) that discuss the challenges associated with measuring reading instruction. The authors argue that the teaching of reading is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon best studied through a variety of overlapping and complementary methods, quantitative and qualitative. They describe how they put this belief into practice in their longitudinal study of reading and mathematics instruction, and they use other articles derived from that study to demonstrate how a mixed methods research design can enhance our understanding of instructional practices and aspects of the social and cultural contexts that influence those practices. They argue against a return to the paradigm wars that plagued education research during the 1980s.

Key Words: education research • mixed methods • reading instruction

Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 7, 541-545 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09348787


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page