Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learning From Our Differences: A Dialogue Across Perspectives on Quality in Education Research

Pamela A. Moss, D. C. Phillips, Frederick D. Erickson, Robert E. Floden, Patti A. Lather and Barbara L. Schneider


PAMELA A. MOSS is a professor of education at the University of Michigan, 4220 SEB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259; pamoss{at}umich.edu. Her research interests are at the intersections of educational assessment, validity theory, and interpretive social science.

D. C. PHILLIPS is professor emeritus of education and (by courtesy) philosophy at Stanford University, 485 Lasuen Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-3096; d.c.phillips{at}gmail.com. His areas of research interest include philosophical and methodological issues in social science and education research and in constructivist positions in psychology, sociology, and science.

FREDERICK D. ERICKSON is the George F. Kneller Professor of Anthropology of Education in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, Box 951521, 1002 MH, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1251; ferickson{at}gseis.ucla. edu. His research interests include organization and conduct of face-to-face interaction, sociolinguistic discourse analysis, ethnographic research methods, study of social interaction as a learning environment, and anthropology of education.

ROBERT E. FLODEN is the University Distinguished Professor of Education at Michigan State University, 116M Erickson Hall East, Lansing, MI 48824-1034; floden{at}msu.edu. He has studied teacher education and other influences on teaching and learning, including work on the cultures of teachers, on teacher development, on the character and effects of teacher education, and on how policy is linked to classroom practice.

PATTI A. LATHER is a professor of education at Ohio State University, 101B Ramseyer Hall, 29 West Woodruff, Columbus, OH 43210; lather.1{at}osu.edu. Her work examines various (post) critical, feminist, and poststructural theories, most recently with a focus on the implications for qualitative inquiry of the call for scientifically based research in education.

BARBARA L. SCHNEIDER is the John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor of Education and a professor of sociology at Michigan State University, 516B Erickson Hall East, Lansing, MI 48824-1034; bschneid{at}msu.edu. Her research interests include sociology of education, scale-up research, and quasi-experimental designs for estimating causal effects.

The dialogue re-presented in this article is intended to foster mutual engagement—and opportunity for learning—across different perspectives on research within the education research community. Participants in the dialogue each addressed the following questions: (1) What are the touchstones by which you judge quality or rigor in education research (for a single study, a set of studies, or a "field" or community of researchers in dialogue)? What is your chief concern or fear that the touchstones guard against? (2) Where do you see challenges to your perspective in the perspectives of other members of the panel? How might your perspective evolve to respond to those challenges? Given all of this, what are the implications for the preparation of education researchers? Opening and closing comments set the dialogue in historical context, highlight issues raised, and suggest next steps for collaborative learning from the diversity of perspectives in our field.

Key Words: epistemology • philosophy of social science • research methodology

Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 7, 501-517 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09348351


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page