Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Positivist Dogmas, Rhetoric, and the Education Science Question

Kenneth R. Howe

KENNETH R. HOWE is a professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder, School of Education 0249, Boulder, CO 80309–0249; Ken.Howe{at}Colorado.edu. His research focuses on education policy, professional ethics, and philosophical issues in education research.

Explicit versions of positivism were cast off some time ago in philosophy, but a tacit form continues to thrive in education research, exemplified by the "new scientific orthodoxy" codified in the National Research Council’s Scientific Research in Education (2002) and reinforced in the American Educational Research Association’s Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications (2006). The author rehearses previous critiques of positivist "dogmas" in education research and applies them to the new orthodoxy. Then, borrowing from the emergent field of the "rhetoric of science," he explores how pursuit of the education science question has nourished a positivist conception of education research. He concludes by suggesting that the education science question should be reframed and briefly suggests how.

Key Words: philosophy • politics • research methodology

Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 6, 428-440 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09342003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
E. Bredo
Comments on Howe: Getting Over the Methodology Wars
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2009; 38(6): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. B. Johnson
Comments on Howe: Toward a More Inclusive "Scientific Research in Education"
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2009; 38(6): 449 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. C. Tillman
Comments on Howe: The Never-Ending Education Science Debate: I'm Ready to Move On
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2009; 38(6): 458 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
K. R. Howe
Response to Comments: Straw Makeovers, Dogmatic Holism, and Interesting Conversation
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2009; 38(6): 463 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page