Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamberg, T. d.
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Design Research Perspectives on Transitioning From Individual Microgenetic Interviews to a Whole-Class Teaching Experiment

Teruni d. Lamberg and James A. Middleton

TERUNI D. LAMBERG is an assistant professor in the College of Education at the University of Nevada, 1664 North Virginia Street MS 280, Reno, NV 89557; terunil{at}unr.edu. Her research interests include children’s mathematical thinking, design research, teacher education, and technology in education.

JAMES A. MIDDLETON is an associate senior vice provost and professor of mathematics education at Arizona State University, Box 871011, Tempe, AZ 85287; james.middleton{at}asu.edu. His research interests include mathematics methods for teachers, children’s mathematical thinking, technological innovation in mathematics education, and motivational processes.

This article describes an education design research program that began with individual microgenetic interviews with children in a laboratory setting and led to a developmental model of students’ understanding of quotients in mathematics and subsequently to the design and testing of an anchored instruction module for use in whole-class work. The authors discuss the design’s theoretical, methodological, and pragmatic aspects. They focus on the development of theory and the generation and refinement of artifacts as mutually constitutive in design research. Special attention is paid to making explicit the causal chain of arguments that link theory development, empirical tests of that theory, and product development. They make the case that effective interventions and rigorous theory can be codeveloped in the design paradigm.

Key Words: classroom research • instructional design and development • interdisciplinary teaching and research • mathematics education • research methodology

Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 4, 233-245 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09334206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page