Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloane, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark

Finbarr C. Sloane

FINBARR C. SLOANE is an associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton College of Education, Division of Curriculum and Instruction, Arizona State University, Room 203b, Farmer Building, Tempe, AZ 85287; Finbarr.Sloane{at}asu.edu. His research focuses on the learning of mathematics, behavioral methodology, and the modeling of student mathematical development in multilevel contexts

The author reviews the recommendations in Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) and agrees that a rebalancing of mathematics education research is timely and necessary, but questions whether randomized trials of small experimental studies and large field studies, without a clearer framing of the needed continuum of studies, can adequately rebalance the portfolio and address the Panel’s "what works" questions. He offers one listing of the possible phases of research required to support high-quality causal inference in mathematics education as a way to foster continued debate about the ease of moving a model of research that works in one domain (drug trials) into the forced service of another intellectual domain (education).

Key Words: efficacy and effectiveness trials • internal and educational research • randomized clinical trials

Educational Researcher, Vol. 37, No. 9, 624-630 (2008)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X08328879


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
C. P. Benbow and L. R. Faulkner
Rejoinder to the Critiques of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report
Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 645 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page