|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations
Robert E. Slavin
Director of the Center for Research and Reform in Education at Johns Hopkins University, 200 W. Towsontown Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21204; rslavin{at}jhu.edu. He is also director of the Institute for Effective Education at the University of York, in York, United Kingdom. His research focuses on comprehensive school reform, cooperative learning, research review, and evidence-based reform.
Syntheses of research on educational programs have taken on increasing policy importance. Procedures for performing such syntheses must therefore produce reliable, unbiased, and meaningful information on the strength of evidence behind each program. Because evaluations of any given program are few in number, syntheses of program evaluations must focus on minimizing bias in reviews of each study. This article discusses key issues in the conduct of program evaluation syntheses: requirements for research design, sample size, adjustments for pretest differences, duration, and use of unbiased outcome measures. It also discusses the need to balance factors such as research designs, effect sizes, and numbers of studies in rating the overall strength of evidence supporting each program.
Key Words: evidence-based reform meta-analysis research review What Works Clearinghouse
Educational Researcher, Vol. 37, No. 1,
5-14 (2008)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X08314117

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Slavin, C. Lake, and C. Groff
Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research,
June 1, 2009;
79(2):
839 - 911.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Desimone
Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures
Educational Researcher,
April 1, 2009;
38(3):
181 - 199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. C. Sloane
Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark
Educational Researcher,
December 1, 2008;
37(9):
624 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Slavin and C. Lake
Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research,
September 1, 2008;
78(3):
427 - 515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Briggs
Comments on Slavin: Synthesizing Causal Inferences
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
15 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Chatterji
Comments on Slavin: Synthesizing Evidence From Impact Evaluations in Education to Inform Action
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
23 - 26.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dynarski
Comments on Slavin: Bringing Answers to Educators: Guiding Principles for Research Syntheses
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
27 - 29.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Green and A. Skukauskaite
Comments on Slavin: Becoming Critical Readers: Issues in Transparency, Representation, and Warranting of Claims
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
30 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Sloane
Comments on Slavin: Through the Looking Glass: Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and the Medical Model
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
41 - 46.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Slavin
Response to Comments: Evidence-Based Reform in Education: Which Evidence Counts?
Educational Researcher,
January 1, 2008;
37(1):
47 - 50.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|