Educational Researcher

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dynarski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Researcher, Vol. 37, No. 1, 27-29 (2008)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X08315011

Comments on Slavin: Bringing Answers to Educators: Guiding Principles for Research Syntheses

Mark Dynarski

A senior fellow and an associate director at Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 600 Alexander Park, Princeton, NJ 08540; MDynarski{at}mathematica-mpr.com. He is also the director of the What Works Clearinghouse. His research focuses on education program evaluations and research methodology.

Research syntheses are appealing because they enable decision makers to determine quickly whether policies, programs, and practices will have effects on student achievement and, if so, the magnitudes of the likely effects. Such syntheses should present objective, clear, scientifically accurate, and defensible evidence in terms that educators can use in making their decisions. The syntheses should also give the most weight to research with strong causal validity and should consider sources of bias and use procedures that reduce or eliminate bias. To that end, it is hoped that theoretical development of standards will help researchers to assess the trade-offs that need to be made in weighing the evidence to be used in syntheses. Creating methods for assessing the extent of evidence in syntheses will enhance their usefulness in evidence-informed decision making.

Key Words: causal inference • program evaluation • research syntheses


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. E. Slavin
Response to Comments: Evidence-Based Reform in Education: Which Evidence Counts?
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 47 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page