This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moss, P. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reconstructing Validity

Professor at the University of Michigan, School of Education, 610 East University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259; pamoss{at}umich.edu. Her areas of specialization are at the intersections of educational assessment, validity theory, and interpretive social science

In response to Lissitz and Samuelsen (2007), the author reconstructs the historical arguments for the more comprehensive unitary concept of validity and the principles of scientific inquiry underlying it. Her response is organized in terms of four questions: (a) How did validity in educational measurement come to be conceptualized as unitary, and why? (b) What is construct validity, and how does it provide the basis for a unitary concept of validity? (c) Why has the focus of validity been on the interpretations and uses of test scores rather than on the test itself? and (d) What sort of guidance for test developers and evaluators has been provided within a unitary concept of validity, and how might it be enhanced? The author highlights the role that cases of programmatic validity research can play in representing validity theory and guiding validity inquiry.

Key Words: construct validity • educational measurement • testing • validity

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Kane Terminology, Emphasis, and Utility in Validation Educational Researcher, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Lissitz and K. Samuelsen Further Clarification Regarding Validity and Education Educational Researcher, November 1, 2007; 36(8): 482 - 484. [Full Text] [PDF]