Educational Researcher

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Embretson, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Researcher, Vol. 36, No. 8, 449-455 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X07311600
© 2007 American Educational Research Association

Construct Validity: A Universal Validity System or Just Another Test Evaluation Procedure?

Susan E. Embretson

Professor of psychology and director of quantitative psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30332; susan.embretson{at}psych.gatech.edu. She was the recipient of the 2001 Distinguished Scientific Lifetime Contribution Award, American Psychological Association, Division of Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics. Her research interests include measurement, psychometric methods, cognition, and individual differences

Lissitz and Samuelsen (2007) have proposed a framework that seemingly deems construct validity evidence irrelevant to supporting educational test meaning. The author of this article agrees with Lissitz and Samuelsen that internal evidence establishes test meaning, but she argues that construct validity need not be removed from the validity sphere. In fact, she argues that doing so could have an adverse impact on the quality of educational tests. She proposes a universal system for construct validity to illustrate how diverse evidence is relevant to claims about measuring examinees’ knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies even when test specifications provide a major source of evidence.

Key Words: construct validity • content validity • educational testing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. T. Kane
Terminology, Emphasis, and Utility in Validation
Educational Researcher, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. W. Lissitz and K. Samuelsen
Further Clarification Regarding Validity and Education
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2007; 36(8): 482 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page