Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golde, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Signature Pedagogies in Doctoral Education: Are They Adaptable for the Preparation of Education Researchers?

Chris M. Golde

Associate vice provost for graduate education at Stanford University; 450 Serra Mall, Building 310, Room 110, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; golde{at}stanford.edu. This article was written while she was a senior scholar and research director for The Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Her research interests include doctoral student attrition, the experiences of graduate students, and doctoral pedagogies

This article describes two practices that can be considered signature pedagogies of doctoral education, one in neuroscience (the journal club) and one in English studies (the list). The practices are routinely found in these and neighboring disciplines but are not found in other fields. The journal club and the list share the goal of acquainting students with the literature of a field, but apart from that, they are very different. In addition to teaching students to work with the literature, they serve other pedagogical goals, including socializing students into disciplinary norms and identities. Thus they serve as windows into the underlying culture of their home disciplines. This article considers the value of adapting these practices into education doctoral programs and offers suggestions for how to modify the practices to suit education.

Key Words: doctoral education • doctoral pedagogy • educational Researchers • graduate education • literature review

Educational Researcher, Vol. 36, No. 6, 344-351 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X07308301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
K. Olson and C. M. Clark
A Signature Pedagogy in Doctoral Education: The Leader-Scholar Community
Educational Researcher, April 1, 2009; 38(3): 216 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page