This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Parker, W. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Public Discourses in Schools: Purposes, Problems, Possibilities

The University of Washington, 122 Miller Hall, Seattle, WA 98195-3600; denver{at}u.washington.edu. His research interests include classroom discussion, the social studies curriculum imaginary, and, broadly, the civic development of youth

Classroom discussion can play an important role in the formation of citizens, and in more ways than one. Yet recitation persists as the discursive norm in classrooms, and the literature on discussion lacks clarity as to purpose. This article contributes a delineation of two purposes—interpretation (enlightenment) and decision making (engagement)—and argues that they are elemental to both discussion pedagogy and citizen formation. As practices, they upend recitation and offer an occasion for liberal education, including opening oneself to difference. The author aims to show that classroom discussion is useful both pedagogically and politically when the two purposes are articulated in a diverse school setting, and that critics risk their own interests when they dismiss the possibilities of discussion.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 35, No. 8, 11-18 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X035008011


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson Energizing Learning: The Instructional Power of Conflict Educational Researcher, January 1, 2009; 38(1): 37 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]