| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Disability Justifies Exclusion of Minority Students: A Critical History Grounded in Disability StudiesTeachers College, Columbia University, Curriculum and Teaching, 302E Main, TC Box 031, New York, NY 10027; dkr10{at}columbia.edu Her scholarly interests embrace the sociopolitical construction of disability, particularly with respect to humor, as well as special educations role as an unintentional tool of institutional racism
Teachers College, Columbia University, Curriculum and Teaching, 302E Main, TC Box 031, New York, NY 10027; knight{at}exchange.tc.columbia.eduHer scholarly interests include equity issues in urban education, teacher education, multicultural feminisms and feminist pedagogies, and African American teaching practices with diverse populations From a disability studies (DS) perspective, the authors analyze how the historical conflation of disability with other identity factors and the ideology of normalcy contribute to the disproportionality problem in K12 special education. They argue that this conflation and ideology make labeling and segregated education seem natural and legitimate for students carrying the high-incidence, legally defined labels Learning Disabled (LD), Mentally Retarded (MR), and Emotionally Disturbed (ED). The authors then apply their insights to the scant literature on college access for students labeled LD. Although it appears that disabled students are succeeding at increasing rates, the overall picture obscures the continued effects of the historical legacy embedded in the intersections of race, class, gender, and disability for K16 students
Educational Researcher, Vol. 35, No. 6,
18-23 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








