Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Disability Justifies Exclusion of Minority Students: A Critical History Grounded in Disability Studies

D. Kim Reid

Teachers College, Columbia University, Curriculum and Teaching, 302E Main, TC Box 031, New York, NY 10027; dkr10{at}columbia.edu Her scholarly interests embrace the sociopolitical construction of disability, particularly with respect to humor, as well as special education’s role as an unintentional tool of institutional racism

Michelle G. Knight

Teachers College, Columbia University, Curriculum and Teaching, 302E Main, TC Box 031, New York, NY 10027; knight{at}exchange.tc.columbia.eduHer scholarly interests include equity issues in urban education, teacher education, multicultural feminisms and feminist pedagogies, and African American teaching practices with diverse populations

From a disability studies (DS) perspective, the authors analyze how the historical conflation of disability with other identity factors and the ideology of normalcy contribute to the disproportionality problem in K–12 special education. They argue that this conflation and ideology make labeling and segregated education seem natural and legitimate for students carrying the high-incidence, legally defined labels Learning Disabled (LD), Mentally Retarded (MR), and Emotionally Disturbed (ED). The authors then apply their insights to the scant literature on college access for students labeled LD. Although it appears that disabled students are succeeding at increasing rates, the overall picture obscures the continued effects of the historical legacy embedded in the intersections of race, class, gender, and disability for K–16 students

Educational Researcher, Vol. 35, No. 6, 18-23 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X035006018


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
S. Strand and G. Lindsay
Evidence of Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education in an English Population
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2009; 43(3): 174 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
W. J. Blanchett, J. K. Klingner, and B. Harry
The Intersection of Race, Culture, Language, and Disability: Implications for Urban Education
Urban Education, July 1, 2009; 44(4): 389 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
B. M. J. Brayboy, A. E. Castagno, and E. Maughan
Chapter 6 Equality and Justice For All? Examining Race in Education Scholarship
Review of Research in Education, March 1, 2007; 31(1): 159 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page