Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Disciplining the Discipline: Anthropology and the Pursuit of Quality Education

Norma González, Anthropologist and an associate professor

The Department of Education, Culture and Society, University of Utah, 1705 E. Campus Center Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9256; norma.gonzalez{at}ed.utah.edu. Her research interests include anthropology and education, language socialization, and language and community

Disciplinary knowledge in anthropology occupies a unique position in relation to quality education: anthropology in education and the anthropology of education. This essay differentiates between anthropology as a field, as a repository of content and disciplinary knowledge (anthropology in education), and anthropology as a tool, as a theoretical and heuristic device that allows us to study students, schooling, learning, and teaching (the anthropology of education). Drawing on Bakhtin’s formulation of centrifugal and centripetal forces, the author argues that anthropology has both enabled and limited possibilities for quality education. A retrospective look at the construct of culture is emblematic of this process. The author claims that the disciplining of anthropological boundaries has often resulted in disengagement of anthropology as a field from issues of practice. Furthermore, the argument is made that an engaged anthropology must confront the implications of its theories, especially as they are applied in the crucible of education and schools.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 5, 17-25 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033005017


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
W. S. E. Lam
Chapter 6: Culture and Learning in the Context of Globalization: Research Directions
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2006; 30(1): 213 - 237.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
O. Lee
Science Education With English Language Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2005; 75(4): 491 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page