Educational Researcher

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 2, 3-11 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033002003

Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education

Joseph A. Maxwell, Associate Professor

The Graduate School of Education, George Mason University, MSN 4B3, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444; jmaxwell{at}gmu.eduHis research interests include the interrelationships between philosophy, social theory, and methodology; qualitative and mixed-method research design and methods; and the role of diversity in education and other communities

A National Research Council report, Scientific Research in Education, has elicited considerable criticism from the education research community, but this criticism has not focused on a key assumption of the report—its Humean, regularity conception of causality. It is argued that this conception, which also underlies other arguments for "scientifically-based research," is narrow and philosophically outdated, and leads to a misrepresentation of the nature and value of qualitative research for causal explanation. An alternative, realist approach to causality is presented that supports the scientific legitimacy of using qualitative research for causal investigation, reframes the arguments for experimental methods in educational research, and can support a more productive collaboration between qualitative and quantitative researchers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
C. E. Coburn and J. L. Russell
District Policy and Teachers' Social Networks
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, September 1, 2008; 30(3): 203 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
D. C. Briggs
Comments on Slavin: Synthesizing Causal Inferences
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
S. C. Yanchar and D. D. Williams
Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism: Five Proposed Guidelines for Method Use
Educational Researcher, December 1, 2006; 35(9): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. S. Kim
Effects of a Voluntary Summer Reading Intervention on Reading Achievement: Results From a Randomized Field Trial
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(4): 335 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
N. Brouwer and F. Korthagen
Can Teacher Education Make a Difference?
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2005; 42(1): 153 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page