This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eisenhart, M. Articles by Towne, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Contestation and Change in National Policy on "Scientifically Based" Education Research

School of Education, 249 UCB, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0248; margaret.eisenhart@colorado. edu. Her interests include anthropology and education, ethnographic research methods, and women’s studies

Lisa Towne, Study Director

The Center for Education of the National Research Council, 500 5th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001; ltowne{at}nas.edu. Her current interests include the conduct, use, and infrastructure of education research and federal "scientifically based research" initiatives

In this article, we examine the definitions of "scientifically based research" in education that have appeared in recent national legislation and policy. These definitions, now written into law in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, and the focus of the National Research Council’s 2002 publication, Scientific Research in Education, are being used to affect decisions about the future of education programs and the direction of education research. Perhaps because of the high stakes involved, there has been some tendency to lump together the definitions emanating from Washington sources. From our perspective as participants in some of this activity, we argue that there are important differences among these definitions and their purposes. Furthermore, we suggest that the various definitions, together with public input about them, can provide leverage for altering the meanings of scientifically based research and education research that are being operationalized in current public policy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. Briggs Comments on Slavin: Synthesizing Causal Inferences Educational Researcher, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 15 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Green and A. Skukauskaite Comments on Slavin: Becoming Critical Readers: Issues in Transparency, Representation, and Warranting of Claims Educational Researcher, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 30 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Shulman, C. M. Golde, A. C. Bueschel, and K. J. Garabedian Reclaiming Education's Doctorates: A Critique and a Proposal Educational Researcher, April 1, 2006; 35(3): 25 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Chatterji Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs Educational Researcher, June 1, 2005; 34(5): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Eisenhart and R. L. DeHaan Doctoral Preparation of Scientifically Based Education Researchers Educational Researcher, May 1, 2005; 34(4): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Beth Harry, K. M. Sturges, and J. K. Klingner Mapping the Process: An Exemplar of Process and Challenge in Grounded Theory Analysis Educational Researcher, March 1, 2005; 34(2): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Chatterji Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs Educational Researcher, December 1, 2004; 33(9): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Maxwell Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education Educational Researcher, March 1, 2004; 33(2): 3 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]