Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anfara, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mangione, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public

Vincent A. Anfara, Jr., An associate professor of Educational Administration and Policy Studies

University of Tennessee, Knoxville, A321 Claxton Complex, Knoxville, TN 37996; vanfara{at}utk.edu

Kathleen M. Brown, An assistant professor of Educational Leadership

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, School of Education, Peabody Hall, CB#3500, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; brownk{at}email.unc.edu

Terri L. Mangione, An assistant professor of Educational Administration and Policy Studies

University of Tennessee, Knoxville, A313 Claxton Complex, Knoxville, TN 37996; tmangion{at}utk.edu

Discussions regarding standards for assessing qualitative research have not sufficiently addressed questions concerning the privatization of this type of analysis. In response to this dilemma, the authors of this article address some of the strategies that they have employed in working with doctoral students and offer suggestions for assessing and publicly disclosing the methodological rigor and analytical defensibility of qualitative research. Specifically, tabular strategies are introduced for use in documenting the relationship between data sources and a study’s research questions, the development of themes and categories, and the triangulation of findings. Examples from three dissertations are provided.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 7, 28-38 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031007028


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The GerontologistHome page
R. Blieszner and K. A. Roberto
Care Partner Responses to the Onset of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Gerontologist, June 2, 2009; (2009) gnp068v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
Beth Harry, K. M. Sturges, and J. K. Klingner
Mapping the Process: An Exemplar of Process and Challenge in Grounded Theory Analysis
Educational Researcher, March 1, 2005; 34(2): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page