Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metz, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Uses of Practitioner Research and Status Issues in Educational Research: Reply to Gary Anderson

Mary Haywood Metz, Professor

Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1000 Bascom Mall, 221 Education Building, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; mhmetz{at}facstaff.wisc.edu. She is a sociologist whose research interests include school organization, teachers’ work lives, and qualitative research.

Reba N. Page, Professor

University of California, Riverside, School of Education, 2128 Sproul Hall, Riverside, CA 92521; reba.page{at}ucr.edu. Her research interests include curriculum studies, interpretive research methodologies, and sociocultural foundations of education.

In calling for practitioner research, Anderson highlights a number of important issues but, as Metz and Page demonstrate in their response, the questions he raises have few straightforward or unequivocal answers. Metz and Page agree that because efforts to study and improve educational practice too often impose abstract findings on schools and teachers, much may be gained from the development of a literature based in practice. They argue, however, that everything included under the umbrella of practitioner research should not be called research. They predict that calling for teachers to engage in activities labeled as research on a broad scale may produce as many unanticipated problems as it does benefits.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 7, 26-27 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031007026


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
D. F. Labaree
The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers
Educational Researcher, May 1, 2003; 32(4): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page