This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, G. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reflecting on Research for Doctoral Students in Education

California State University, Los Angeles, Charter College of Education, Division of Administration and Counseling, Los Angeles, CA 90032; ganders{at}calstatela.edu. His work focuses on the politics of education, critical theory, action research, and corporate involvement in education

This response to the theme issue, Research for Doctoral Students in Education, argues that the continua presented in the articles fail to legitimize practitioner research, that is, research done by school practitioners on site. Issues relating to differences in rigor, status, and purpose between practitioner and other research are discussed.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 7, 22-25 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031007022


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Eisenhart and R. L. DeHaan Doctoral Preparation of Scientifically Based Education Researchers Educational Researcher, May 1, 2005; 34(4): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. F. Labaree The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers Educational Researcher, May 1, 2003; 32(4): 13 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]