This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fenstermacher, G. D Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reconsidering the Teacher Education Reform Debate: A Commentary on Cochran-Smith and Fries

University of Michigan School of Education, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; gfenster{at}umich.edu. His research interests are focused on the philosophy and politics of teaching

In the November 2001 issue of Educational Researcher, Marilyn Cochran-Smith and Mary Kim Fries provided a penetrating analysis of the discourse that comprises the debate between those who advocate highly professionalized teacher preparation and those who seek simpler and more abundant routes to teacher training and certification. This commentary extends the Cochran-Smith and Fries analysis in several directions, inquiring into the democratic and anti-democratic features of the debate between those who would further professionalize teaching and those who would deregulate it. Among the matters probed here are the importance of thoughtful opposition, how and where on the political landscape that opposition is resolved, and who is engaged in the resolution.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 6, 20-22 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031006020


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. McLeskey and D. D. Ross The Politics of Teacher Education in the New Millennium: Implications for Special Education Teacher Educators Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2004; 27(4): 342 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]