Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

School Choice: An Examination of the Empirical Evidence on Achievement, Parental Decision Making, and Equity

Dan D. Goldhaber, research associate

The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037. His areas of specialization are education productivity and reform, and teacher labor markets

Support for all forms of school choice—public school choice, charter schools, and public-private choice—has been growing in recent years. Arguments in favor of greater choice rest on two propositions: that choice would serve to give more control over educational decisions to parents who in turn would choose good schools for their children, and that competition between schools for students will help reduce inefficiencies in the delivery of education, and, in doing so, improve educational outcomes. This review focuses on quantitative assessments of the impact of choice on educational outcomes. Several questions are examined in detail. First, is there any evidence that the various alternatives to traditional public schools—magnet schools, charter schools, and private schools—are delivering education in a fundamentally different and more efficient fashion? In other words, after accounting for differences in the backgrounds of the students attending these schools, are they better at educating students? Second, what are the equity consequences and demographic implications of enhanced school choice? Third, how might enhanced choice affect support for traditional public schools?

Educational Researcher, Vol. 28, No. 9, 16-25 (1999)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X028009016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
D. D. Goldhaber and E. R. Eide
Methodological Thoughts on Measuring the Impact of Private Sector Competition on the Educational Marketplace
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2003; 25(2): 217 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
H. M. Levin
A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Educational Vouchers
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2002; 24(3): 159 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
D. Goldhaber
School Choice: Do We Know Enough?
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2000; 29(8): 21 - 22.
[PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page