Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Interpretive Turn and the New Debate in Education

Kenneth R. Howe, professor

The School of Education at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0249. He specializes in the philosophy of education

Over the last several decades, positivist-behaviorist approaches to social and educational research have been on the decline, whereas interpretive approaches have been on the rise. As a result of this "interpretive turn" the old debate between positivism and interpretivism (and central to the quantitative-qualitative debate) has diminished in intensity only to be replaced by a new debate in terms of postmodernists-who would abandon the emancipatory project of modernity as fatally flawed –versus transformationists- who would modify this project and endeavor to see it through. Among the conclusions advanced is that the differences between these two general perspectives tend to be overdrawn, particularly when philosophical avowals are measured against the requirements of practice.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 27, No. 8, 13-20 (1998)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X027008013


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. R. Howe
Isolating Science from the Humanities: The Third Dogma of Educational Research
Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2009; 15(4): 766 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. Eisenhart
Educational Ethnography Past, Present, and Future: Ideas to Think With
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2001; 30(8): 16 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
J. L. Paul and K. Marfo
Preparation of Educational Researchers in Philosophical Foundations of Inquiry
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2001; 71(4): 525 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
W. S. Pillow
Deciphering Attempts to Decipher Postmodern Educational Research
Educational Researcher, June 1, 2000; 29(5): 21 - 24.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
L. Weiner
Research in the 90s: Implications for Urban Teacher Preparation
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2000; 70(3): 369 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
C. E. Sleeter
Chapter 6: Epistemological Diversity in Research on Preservice Teacher Preparation for Historically Underserved Children
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2000; 25(1): 209 - 250.
[PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page