This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sternberg, R. J. Articles by Horvath, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Prototype View of Expert Teaching

Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205. His areas of specialization are intelligence, creativity, and styles of thinking.

Joseph A. Horvath, Associate Research Scientist

Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205. His areas of specialization are practical intelligence, learning in the work-place, and leadership

We call for a reconceptualization of teaching expertise, one grounded in a psychological understanding of how (a) experts differ from nonexperts, and (b) people think about expertise as they encounter it in real-world settings. To this end, we propose that teaching expertise be viewed as a category that is structured by the similarity of expert teachers to one another rather than by a set of necessary and sufficient features. A convenient way of thinking about such categories is in terms of a central exemplar or prototype (Rosch, 1978), and we believe that a prototype view can contribute in important ways to a dialogue on expert teaching. Most importantly, a prototype view provides a way of thinking about expertise that incorporates standards (such that not every experienced practitioner is an expert) but also allows for variability in the profiles of individual experts. In this article, we outline a rudimentary model of prototype-based categorization and identify possible features, drawn from psychological research, on which the family resemblance among expert teachers may be founded. We discuss several implications of the prototype view for understanding and fostering expertise among teachers.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 24, No. 6, 9-17 (1995)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X024006009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Bergee An exploratory comparison of novice, intermediate, and expert orchestral conductors International Journal of Music Education, April 1, 2005; 23(1): 23 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. W. Sogin and C. C. Wang An Exploratory Study of Music Teachers' Perception of Factors Associated with Expertise in Music Teaching Journal of Music Teacher Education, January 1, 2002; 12(1): e12 - e18. [PDF]

				J. Wang and S. J. Odell Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-Based Reform: A Critical Review Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2002; 72(3): 481 - 546. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A Langer Beating the Odds: Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2001; 38(4): 837 - 880. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M Jensen, J. Gwyer, K. F Shepard, and L. M Hack Expert Practice in Physical Therapy Physical Therapy, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 28 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Ross, J. B. Cousins, T. Gadalla, and L. Hannay Administrative Assignment of Teachers in Restructuring Secondary Schools: The Effect of Out-of-Field Course Responsibility on Teacher Efficacy Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 1999; 35(5): 782 - 805. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Sternberg Abilities Are Forms of Developing Expertise Educational Researcher, April 1, 1998; 27(3): 11 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. M. J. Robinson Methodology and the Research-Practice Gap Educational Researcher, January 1, 1998; 27(1): 17 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]