Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRAWAT, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Value of Ideas: Problems Versus Possibilities in Learning

RICHARD S. PRAWAT, professor of educational psychology and teacher education and chairperson

Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, 449 Erickson Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034. He specializes in learning and teaching for understanding, classroom motivation, and teachers' professional development

The advantages of involving students in authentic problem-solving activity is one thing about which all contemporary learning theorists agree. Such an approach fits well with the strategy-based performance model advanced by information processors, the impasse or perturbation learning model advanced by cognitive constructivists, and the socially mediated apprenticeship model advanced by the cultural anthropologists. Despite its pedagogical popularity, a focus on practical problem solving is subject to criticism because it downplays the transformative role of experience in education; the tendency in this approach is to define the world in negative terms, as a series of obstacles or impediments to be overcome. In the alternative view presented in this article, termed idea-based social constructivism, the focus is less on problems and more on the possibilities inherent in a given situation.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 22, No. 6, 5-16 (1993)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X022006005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. S. Prawat
Dewey, Peirce, and the Learning Paradox
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1999; 36(1): 47 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. Russell
AERJ Response
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1999; 36(1): 101 - 106.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. S. Prawat
Misreading Dewey: Reform, Projects, and the Language Game
Educational Researcher, October 1, 1995; 24(7): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page