This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by MCGILL-FRANZEN, A. Articles by ALLINGTON, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Flunk’em or Get Them Classified

The Contamination of Primary Grade Accountability Data

State University of New York at Albany, ED 333, 1400 Washington, Albany, NY 12222. She specializes in literacy and public policy

RICHARD L. ALLINGTON, professor

State University of New York at Albany, ED 309, 1400 Washington, Albany, NY 12222. He specializes in reading/learning disabilities

The authors argue not only that high-stakes primary grade testing increases the pressure on low-achieving schools to improve their test performance but that these assessment mandates also increase the chances that low-scoring children will be retained in grade or classified as handicapped. Placement practices such as handicapped classification, flunking, and "developmental" classes remove low- achieving children from the assessment stream and, in the authors’ view, constitute not just pollution of assessment data, but outright contamination of the reported results. The authors regard decisions to classify or fail low-achieving children as egregiously unethical if such decisions are motivated by pressure to increase the school’s publicly reported test performance, and they suggest that current high-stakes testing programs be modified to eliminate any incentives to engage in such placement practices.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 22, No. 1, 19-22 (1993)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X022001019


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Blanchett, E. Brantlinger, and M. W. Shealey Brown 50 Years Later Exclusion, Segregation, and Inclusion: Guest Editors' Introduction Remedial and Special Education, April 1, 2005; 26(2): 66 - 69. [PDF]

				M. L. Thurlow, A. L. House, D. L. Scott, and J. E. Ysseldyke Students with Disabilities in Large-Scale Assessments: State Participation and Accommodation Policies Journal of Special Education, October 1, 2000; 34(3): 154 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Brantlinger Using Ideology: Cases of Nonrecognition of the Politics of Research and Practice in Special Education Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1997; 67(4): 425 - 459. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. MAY, D. KUNDERT, O. NIKOLOFF, E. WELCH, M. GARRETT, and D. BRENT School Readiness: An Obstacle to Intervention and Inclusion Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1994; 18(3): 290 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. E. Garcia and P. D. Pearson Chapter 8: Assessment and Diversity Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1994; 20(1): 337 - 391. [PDF]

				A. Biemiller Lake Wobegon Revisited: On Diversity and Education Educational Researcher, December 1, 1993; 22(9): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. W. Howell, S. S. Bigelow, E. L. Moore, and A. M. Evoy Bias in Authentic Assessment Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 1993; 19(1): 387 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]