Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rizo, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Controversy About Quantification in Social Research: An Extension of Gage’s "‘Historical’ Sketch"

Felipe M. Rizo, Professor

The Department of Sociology Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, San Cosine No. 108, Aguascalientes, Mexico 20010. He specializes in sociology of education and educational research methodology and philosophy

In his address at the 1989 AERA Annual Meeting, N. L. Gage presented his view about the future of educational research in the context of the "paradigm wars." In this article, after a short review of quantitativist versus qualitativist controversies, from the 17th century until the present, I risk a prediction about the issue of the debate for the year 2009: Confrontation will continue. But that does not mean that there is not any advance or that history is cyclical: Controversy is the way to progress. By learning from old discussions, we will be able not to suppress but to surpass them.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 20, No. 9, 9-12 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X020009009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page