This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GAGE, N. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Obviousness of Social and Educational Research Results

The School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Highly estimable writers have averred that well nigh all of the results of social and educational research are obvious, that is, could have been predicted without doing the research. To examine the justifiability of this allegation, one should examine its accord with actual research results. Thus, is it a "truism" that higher achievement comes about when students spend more time with the subject matter? That smaller groups are easier to control than larger groups? Do judges regard actual results as more obvious and statements of their opposites as nonobvious ? Both the century-old research results of Joseph Mayer Rice and recent results throw light on these issues.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 20, No. 1, 10-16 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X020001010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Chatterji Grades of Evidence: Variability in Quality of Findings in Effectiveness Studies of Complex Field Interventions American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 239 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Chatterji Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs Educational Researcher, December 1, 2004; 33(9): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Tschannen-Moran, W. A. Firestone, W. K. Hoy, and S. M. Johnson The Write Stuff: A Study of Productive Scholars in Educational Administration Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 2000; 36(3): 358 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Holman A Dialogical Approach to Skill and Skilled Activity Human Relations, July 1, 2000; 53(7): 957 - 980. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. GIPPS Chapter 10: Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 355 - 392. [PDF]

				L. I. Anderson, C. K. Quinn, and M. A. Horney Computer-Based Study Strategies For Students With Learning Disabilities: Individual Differences Associated With Adoption Level J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1996; 29(5): 461 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hauser and D. B. Malouf A Federal Perspective On Special Education Technology J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1996; 29(5): 504 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. L. Gage Confronting Counsels of Despair for the Behavioral Sciences Educational Researcher, April 1, 1996; 25(3): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. S. Schwartz and L. B. Olswang Evaluating Child Behavior Change in Natural Settings: Exploring Alternative Strategies for Data Collection Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1996; 16(1): 82 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Levin Estimating the Value of a Knowledge Base for School Learning Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1993; 63(3): 335 - 343. [PDF]