Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, K.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhart, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Standards for Qualitative (and Quantitative) Research: A Prolegomenon

Kenneth Howe and Margaret Eisenhart

School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0249

The proliferation of qualitative methods in educational research has led to considerable controversy about standards for the design and conduct of research. This controversy has been playing itself out over the last several decades largely in terms of the quantitative-qualitative debate. In this paper we argue that framing the issue of standards in terms of quantitative-qualitative debate is misguided. We argue instead that the problem of standards—for qualitative and quantitative research—is best framed in terms of the "logics in use" associated with various research methodologies. In particular, rather than being judged in terms of qualitative versus quantitative paradigms, logics in use, which are often drawn from other academic disciplines and adapted for the purposes of educational research, are judged in terms of their success in investigating educational problems deemed important. Finally, we proffer five general standards that can apply to educational research of all kinds.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2-9 (1990)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X019004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. Freeman, K. deMarrais, J. Preissle, K. Roulston, and E. A. St. Pierre
Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. A. Maxwell
Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education
Educational Researcher, March 1, 2004; 33(2): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
D. F. Labaree
The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers
Educational Researcher, May 1, 2003; 32(4): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. J Feuer, L. Towne, and R. J Shavelson
Scientific Culture and Educational Research
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2002; 31(8): 4 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
V. A. Anfara Jr., K. M. Brown, and T. L. Mangione
Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public
Educational Researcher, October 1, 2002; 31(7): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
M. S. Moses
Chapter 1: The Heart of the Matter: Philosophy and Educational Research
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2002; 26(1): 1 - 21.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
K. R. Howe
The Interpretive Turn and the New Debate in Education
Educational Researcher, November 1, 1998; 27(8): 13 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. Eisenhart
Research news and Comment
Educational Researcher, December 1, 1995; 24(9): 32 - 33.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. Wagner
Ignorance in Educational Research Or, How Can You Not Know That?
Educational Researcher, June 1, 1993; 22(5): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
A. PESHKIN
The Goodness of Qualitative Research
Educational Researcher, March 1, 1993; 22(2): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
H. G. Petrie
Chapter 7: Interdisciplinary Education: Are We Faced With Insurmountable Opportunities?
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1992; 18(1): 299 - 333.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
G. Salomon
Transcending the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: The Analytic and Systemic Approaches to Educational Research
Educational Researcher, August 1, 1991; 20(6): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
S. I. MILLER and M. FREDERICKS
Postpositivistic Assumptions and Educational Research: Another View
Educational Researcher, May 1, 1991; 20(4): 2 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. T. Ogawa and B. Malen
Towards Rigor in Reviews of Multivocal Literatures: Applying the Exploratory Case Study Method
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1991; 61(3): 265 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page