Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McPeck, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: A Reply to Ennis

John E. McPeck, Faculty of Education

University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6G 1G7, Canada.

Robert Ennis' recentEducational Researcher article (1989) helps to clarify the troublesome notion of subject specificity in the growing literature on critical thinking. It brings a welcome breath of fresh air to a set of questions that has vexed research efforts and educational programs that attempt to promote critical thinking. In calling for clarification on this matter, Ennis has also raised the level of discussion about the meaning of the terms subjects, domains, and even psychological transfer. No longer can we simply gloss over questions about the precise scope and limits of the putative skills that various critical thinking programs are alleged to promote. The recent paper in this journal by Perkins and Salomon (1989) also provides a useful historical overview of just how vexing this problem has been over the past 30 years. This article both replies to Ennis and continues the discussion.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No. 4, 10-12 (1990)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X019004010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
K. Struyven, F. Dochy, and S. Janssens
The Effects of Hands-On Experience On Students' Preferences for Assessment Methods
Journal of Teacher Education, February 1, 2008; 59(1): 69 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
T. J. Burant, S. M. Chubbuck, and J. L. Whipp
Reclaiming the Moral in the Dispositions Debate
Journal of Teacher Education, December 1, 2007; 58(5): 397 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
P. A. Gordon, D. Feldman, and J. Chiriboga
Helping Children with Disabilities Develop and Maintain Friendships
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
D. Scanlon, M. Gallego, G. Z. Duran, and E. I. Reyes
Interactive Staff Development Supports Collaboration When Learning to Teach
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 40 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
F. W. Kohler, H. K. Ezell, and M. Paluselli
Promoting Changes in Teachers' Conduct of Student Pair Activities: An Examination of Reciprocal Peer Coaching
Journal of Special Education, October 1, 1999; 33(3): 154 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
J. K. Klingner, S. Vaughn, M. Tejero Hughes, and M. E. Arguelles
Sustaining Research-Based Practices in Reading: A 3-Year Follow-up
Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1999; 20(5): 263 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
N. D. Burstein and S. Sears
Preparing On-the-Job Teachers for Urban Schools: Implications for Teacher Training
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 1998; 21(1): 47 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
P. F. Vadasy, J. R. Jenkins, L. R. Antil, N. B. Phillips, and K. Pool
The Research-to-Practice Ball Game: Classwide Peer Tutoring and Teacher Interest, Implementation, and Modifications
Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 1997; 18(3): 143 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
R. GERSTEN and S. U. BRENGELMAN
The Quest to Translate Research Into Classroom Practice: The Emerging Knowledge Base
Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1996; 17(2): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
C. SUE ENGLERT and K. L. TARRANT
Creating Collaborative Cultures for Educational Change
Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 1995; 16(6): 325 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
E. P. SCHILLER, D. B. MALOUF, and L. C. DANIELSON
Research Utilization A Federal Perspective
Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 1995; 16(6): 372 - 375.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
C. S. BOS
Professional Development and Teacher Change Encouraging News From the Trenches
Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 1995; 16(6): 379 - 382.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
D. K. REID, C. KURKJIAN, and S. S. CARRUTHERS
Special Education Teachers Interpret Constructivist Teaching
Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1994; 15(5): 267 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
J. A. Muchmore
A Statewide Survey of the Beliefs and Practices of Chapter 1 Reading Teachers
Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 1994; 15(4): 252 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
K. E. Stanovich
Reconceptualizing Intelligence: Dysrationalia as an Intuition Pump
Educational Researcher, May 1, 1994; 23(4): 11 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
K. E. Stanovich
Dysrationalia: A New Specific Learning Disability
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 1993; 26(8): 501 - 515.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
N. J. Ellsworth
Trainees' Perceptions of Types of Instructional Practices Modeled in an Urban Teacher Education Program
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 1993; 16(1): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
P. Smagorinsky and M. W. Smith
The Nature of Knowledge in Composition and Literary Understanding: The Question of Specificity
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1992; 62(3): 279 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page