Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Researcher
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

New Directions and Initiatives at NCES: Implications for Educational Research, Policy, and Practice

Emerson J. Elliott, Acting Commissioner of Education Statistics

National Center for Education Statistics, 555 New Jersey Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20208-5574.

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) has made significant changes following a severely critical evaluation by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in 1986. Improvements are under way to fill data gaps, raise technical standards, and expand staff resources. Sharply increased appropriations and new legislation indicate Executive Branch and Congressional support. Researchers are encouraged to advise the Center, use the newly enlarged data for analyses, and propose targeted supplements to NCES studies. The "new NCES" will persist because data are needed by the public and by decision makers.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 18, No. 3, 11-16 (1989)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018003011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cultural Studies <=> Critical MethodologiesHome page
J. K. Smith and D. J. Gallagher
An Essay on the Politics of Schooling and Educational Research
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, August 1, 2008; 8(3): 284 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
M. J. Melrose
Maximizing the Rigor of Action Research: Why Would You Want To? How Could You?
Field Methods, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 160 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
A. S. Bryk and K. L. Hermanson
Chapter 10: Educational Indicator Systems: Observations on Their Structure, Interpretation, and Use
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1993; 19(1): 451 - 484.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
A. C. Porter
Creating a System of School Process Indicators
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1991; 13(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. Holeton
Research news and Comment: Congressional Hearings Spotlight Federal Support for Educational R&D: What Will Become of OERI?
Educational Researcher, January 1, 1990; 19(1): 29 - 32.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. M. Kauffman
The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush Education Policy: A Trickle-Down Theory of Education of the Hard-to-Teach
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1989; 23(3): 256 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page