This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DONMOYER, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Rescue From Relativism: Two Failed Attempts and an Alternative Strategy

The Ohio State University

Widespread acceptance of the notion of relativism has been prompted by post-positivist philosophers’ discussions of the role that paradigms play in empirical inquiry and their claims that empirical evidence is inadequate for settling paradigm disputes. Problems with relativism, in turn, have encouraged certain epistemologists and methodologists to resurrect aspects of local positivism. In this article, the author critiques attempts to resurrect aspects of positivism and argues that the work of certain post-positivist philosophers of science–in particular, Toulmin’s discussions of the role that purpose plays in rational decisionmaking–provides a more adequate response to the problems associated with relativism.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 14, No. 10, 13-20 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X014010013


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Scheurich and M. D. Young Rejoinder: in the United States of America, in Both Our Souls and Our Sciences, We Are Avoiding White Racism Educational Researcher, December 1, 1998; 27(9): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. F. Labaree Educational Researchers: Living With a Lesser Form of Knowledge Educational Researcher, November 1, 1998; 27(8): 4 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. I. MILLER and M. FREDERICKS Postpositivistic Assumptions and Educational Research: Another View Educational Researcher, May 1, 1991; 20(4): 2 - 8. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Heshusius Holistic Principles: Not Enhancing the Old but Seeing A-new. A Rejoinder J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1989; 22(10): 595 - 601. [PDF]

				L. Heshusius The Newtonian Mechanistic Paradigm, Special Education, and Contours of Alternatives: An Overview J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1989; 22(7): 403 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Rosenberg and L. Jackson Theoretical Models and Special Education: The Impact of Varying Worldviews on Service Delivery and Research Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 1988; 9(3): 26 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Smith Publishing Qualitative Research American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1987; 24(2): 173 - 183. [PDF]

				J. W. Garrison Some Principles of Postpositivistic Philosophy of Science Educational Researcher, November 1, 1986; 15(9): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Phillips Letters: A Reply to Donmoyer Educational Researcher, April 1, 1986; 15(4): 18 - 19. [PDF]

				A. M. Huberman and M. B. Miles Letters: Concepts and Methods in Qualitative Research: A Reply to Donmoyer Educational Researcher, March 1, 1986; 15(3): 25 - 26. [PDF]