This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by JUSTIZ, M. J. Articles by MOORMAN, H. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

New NIE Peer Review Procedures

National Institute of Education

This article is intended to communicate to the educational research community the Institute's plan and rationale for peer review. We will describe briefly the history of peer review at the National Institute of Education (NIE), discuss some broad principles of federal research management and peer review, note recent recommendations for improving NIE's peer review procedures, and sketch the procedures that will guide the Institute in the lab and center competition.

Educational Researcher, Vol. 14, No. 1, 5-11 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X014001005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				l. L. Densten and J. H. Gray The Case for Using both Latent and Manifest Variables to Investigate Management-by-Exception Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 1999; 5(3): 80 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Austin, K. A. Boyle, and J. C. Lualhati Statistical Conclusion Validity for Organizational Science Researchers: A Review Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 1998; 1(2): 164 - 208. [Abstract]

				S. P. Miller and C. D. Mercer Educational Aspects of Mathematics Disabilities J Learn Disabil, January 1, 1997; 30(1): 47 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Baumberger and A. W. Bangert Research Designs and Statistical Techniques Used in the Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989--1993 J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1996; 29(3): 313 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Foshee, M. A. Davis, and M. A. C. Stone Evaluating the Impact of Criterion-Referenced Measurement on Remediation Decisions Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1991; 12(2): 48 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Carter and H. Lee Swanson An Analysis of the Most Frequently Cited Gifted Journal Articles Since the Marland Report: Implications for Researchers Gifted Child Quarterly, July 1, 1990; 34(3): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Cawley and J. H. Miller Cross-Sectional Comparisons of the Mathematical Performance of Children with Learning Disabilities: Are We on the Right Track Toward Comprehensive Programming? J Learn Disabil, April 1, 1989; 22(4): 250 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. L. Swanson, D. Plank, and J. Still The Characteristics of Prominent Articles with "Special Education" in the Title Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1988; 9(5): 41 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Murphy, P. Hallinger, and L. S. Lotto Inequitable Allocations of Alterable Learning Variables1 Journal of Teacher Education, December 1, 1986; 37(6): 21 - 26. [Abstract]

				H. N. MOORMAN and T. G. CARROLL Peer Review and the NIE/OERI Competition for Regional Educational Laboratories and National R&D Centers Educational Researcher, August 1, 1986; 15(7): 16 - 19. [PDF]

				W. D. Hawley A Critical Analysis of The Holmes Group's for Reforming Teacher Education: Holmes Report Journal of Teacher Education, July 1, 1986; 37(4): 47 - 51.

				H. L. Swanson and M. Trahan Characteristics of Frequently Cited Articles in Learning Disabilities Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1986; 20(2): 167 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. SALOMON and H. GARDNER The Computer as Educator: Lessons From Television Research Educational Researcher, January 1, 1986; 15(1): 13 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]